Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site .UUCP.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!.UUCP!jlp
From: jlp@.UUCP.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <40000002@.UUCP.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 14-Jan-86 17:08:00 EST
Article-I.D.: .40000002
Posted: Tue Jan 14 17:08:00 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jan-86 08:16:49 EST
References: <579@harvard.UUCP>
Lines: 21
Nf-ID: #R:harvard:-57900:.UUCP:40000002:177600:1017
Nf-From: .UUCP!jlp    Jan 14 17:08:00 1986


{}
Legal Eagle, Help!! ouldn't Marty be saved ( have been saved) by tying into
the contract the SPECIFIC provision that all prices quoted as signatory to
the lease (state tax, excise tax, insurance, maintenance fees ) are fixed,
otherwise the lease may be anulled ( or voided, or whatever the legalese i
for this stuff)? It seems that this is a clear contract violation in
principle, but we lessees ( I'm one too ) have to be sure we're covered. 

As for me, I'm looking forward to rollover date: Going from a loaded
Pontiac 6000 LE to a Baby Merc 190whatever. Fleet leasing is quite
appealing, especially in the Boston area, where college tuition is often
cheaper than insurance. But if fleet leasing is nothing more than bait,
i'll be glad to avoid it . Marshall Pontiac, saugus, simply paid half my
boston insurance out flat for the first year. the insurance came "down" 25%
in the second year, representing an out-of-pocket increase of 50% for me.
but hey, that's boston.


Jerryl Payne
...!ihnp4!inmet!faust!jlp