Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cylixd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!akgub!cylixd!dave
From: dave@cylixd.UUCP (Dave Kirby)
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.auto.tech
Subject: Re: Breaking Systems
Message-ID: <658@cylixd.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 6-Jan-86 13:53:21 EST
Article-I.D.: cylixd.658
Posted: Mon Jan  6 13:53:21 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Jan-86 06:06:40 EST
Reply-To: dave@cylixd.UUCP (Dave Kirby)
Distribution: net
Organization: RCA Cylix Communications , Memphis, TN
Lines: 13
Xref: watmath net.auto:8980 net.auto.tech:553

In article <2101@phri.UUCP> fritz@phri.UUCP (Dave Fritzinger) writes:

>If you want something that handles half decently, I would avoid muscle cars
>like the plague...  Breaking systems also tend to be rather dubious, since
>these cars are heavy, with break technology from the sixties.  

The best breaking system I have ever seen was on an old '67 Ambassador
(AMC). I found its breaking system to be very reliable, as the car
stayed broken the whole time I owned it. Brake technology was standard
1960's, but the car's break technology was well ahead of its time.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Kirby    ( ...!ihnp4!akgub!cylixd!dave)