Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site terak.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!noao!terak!suze From: suze@terak.UUCP (Suzanne Barnett) Newsgroups: net.invest,net.consumers Subject: Re: Re: Re: "No Money Down" (Other People's Money) Scam Message-ID: <990@terak.UUCP> Date: Thu, 16-Jan-86 12:14:16 EST Article-I.D.: terak.990 Posted: Thu Jan 16 12:14:16 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 20-Jan-86 05:26:50 EST References: <164@bubba.UUCP> <757@hou2g.UUCP> <131@molihp.UUCP> Organization: Calcomp Display Products Division, Scottsdale, AZ, USA Lines: 55 Xref: watmath net.invest:1045 net.consumers:3927 > In article <757@hou2g.UUCP> scott@hou2g.UUCP (The Brennan Monster) writes: > >I guess), but could someone please enlighten me as > >to WHY someone with a $200,000 house would accept > >$150,000 for it? Even if paid in cash? > > > > Scott J. Berry > > ihnp4!hou2g!scott > > And allong those same lines, Doesn't everyone who own's a house and > sells it recieve the equivelent of cash anyway ? I mean, If I want > to buy a house, I get a loan from the bank to buy the house and buy > it completely. The bank now really own's the house until I can come > up with enough money to give the bank for the house (interest + cost). > So the original owner gets completely paid, and is no longer in the > picture; or at least after paying off his debts. > > IE. There doesn't seem to be any advantage in selling the house to > the person who *states* he will pay cash, when that is the condition > of the sale anyway - unless he was trying to sell it through a > broker of some sort, and needs money NOW. > > > I would apreciate flaws in this thinking > to be pointed out, if any. > > -- Martin the Magician. Well, if the house is being bought without a loan, the seller won't have any points to pay. Depending on the current conditions, this could be a very large or very small savings. However, points are not always required on loans (usually those with large percentages down), and unless the loan is VA, it's a negotiable item as to who pays whatever points are required by the lender. If the house is NOT sold through a real estate agent, a commission is saved. The commission is usually a percentage of the sales price. There are various and sundry fees required in selling a home, such as title insurance, prepaids, filing/recording fees etc. The deal could have been that the buyer paid all of this, which is not listed as a paart of the sales price. But even in the best view of the buyer, I can't see that this could possibly amount to $50,000 saved. Unless the home was overpriced, or the seller was afraid of losing it through foreclosure it doesn't make sense to me either. -- Suzanne Barnett-Scott uucp: ...{decvax,ihnp4,noao,savax,seismo}!terak!suze CalComp/Sanders Display Products Division 14151 N 76th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (602) 998-4800