Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site tymix.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!lll-crg!qantel!hplabs!oliveb!tymix!stimac From: stimac@tymix.UUCP (Michael Stimac) Newsgroups: net.games.hack Subject: request for spoiler, re: fake amulets Message-ID: <618@tymix.UUCP> Date: Tue, 14-Jan-86 17:09:35 EST Article-I.D.: tymix.618 Posted: Tue Jan 14 17:09:35 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 17-Jan-86 06:23:41 EST Organization: Tymnet Inc., Cupertino CA Lines: 36 Several weeks ago I posted the outcome of a game in which I had retrieved the amulet, only to find out upon leaving the dungeon that it was a cheap, imitation amulet, worth only a couple of Zorkmids. No one offered any suggestions why this had happened. Since then, rather, I have seen more discussion about going down to level 39 (via confusion, certain rings, and a scroll of teleportation), killing the wizard and his dog, and thereby gaining the amulet. I obtained my amulet by precisely this method. I know that amulets obtained from a wishing wand are imitations, but everyone still seems to think that the one from the Hound of Hell is the real McCoy. Not so! At least not so under certain unknown conditions. My suspicions: 1) I had taken advantage of the postman. Maybe the game punishes the player for this by making the real amulet into a fake ??? 2) I had read a scroll of mapping to find the Wizard and his Hound. In the middle of the moat I noticed an "@" which I did not go near. It puzzled me, but I did not want to take a chance on some 39th level shopkeeper doing me in after I had gotten what I thought was THE amulet. Maybe this "@" character was the true key to the amulet? Why would a shopkeeper be on level 39 in the middle of the wizards moat? 3) Maybe all the net chatter about the Wizard and his Hound is just a red herring. Those who have REALLY won the game are just teasing the rest of us??? I have not been able to get to level 39 without the postman to test theory 1. Can anyone shed some light on what happened to me? We have version 1.0.3, on Berkeley 4.2. I am willing to accept any and all spoilers at this point. Michael Stimac