Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihu1h.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ihu1h!parnass From: parnass@ihu1h.UUCP (Bob Parnass, AJ9S) Newsgroups: net.ham-radio Subject: About those equipment surveys .... Message-ID: <745@ihu1h.UUCP> Date: Mon, 20-Jan-86 16:49:01 EST Article-I.D.: ihu1h.745 Posted: Mon Jan 20 16:49:01 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 22-Jan-86 04:22:40 EST Distribution: net Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 48 x In regards to recent Scanner Survey and Owner's Report articles, I don't receive sample scanners from manufac- turers for evaluation. As a hobbyist, the equipment I review is that which I've purchased or repaired for myself or others, and had an opportunity to evaluate "hands-on". If I haven't had enough experience with a particular model to make anything more than superficial remarks, I'm timid about writing a review. I would enjoy reading articles by owners of - Drake DSR2, ITT Mackay Marine, or TMC GPR90 general coverage receivers, - Regency MX7000/MX5000 or Z-series scanners, - JIL SX400 scanners, - Bearcat 50XL portable scanners, - other scanner or shortwave receivers, - scanner antennas. - receiver accessories (descramblers, tape recorder interfaces, broadcast band rejection filters, Fox- Tango IF filters, etc.) How does your equipment perform? If you've encountered any equipment failures, what parts were defective? Was it difficult to repair? Have you found a way to "trick" it into doing something new? Is anyone still actively using those older, tuneable pub- lic service monitor receivers, like the Radio Shack PRO- 2B, early Regency Monitoradios, or Lafayette PF series? I've a shelf full of these vintage radios and collect more every hamfest. I hope you enjoy reading this stuff as much as I like writing it. Thanks for your support. -- =============================================================================== Bob Parnass, Bell Telephone Laboratories - ihnp4!ihu1h!parnass - (312)979-5414