Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!rh
From: rh@mit-eddie.UUCP (Randy Haskins)
Newsgroups: net.jobs,net.singles
Subject: Re: Headhunters, hearthunters.
Message-ID: <1029@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 22-Jan-86 21:04:35 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.1029
Posted: Wed Jan 22 21:04:35 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 24-Jan-86 21:27:31 EST
References: <5662@cca.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.jobs:1783 net.singles:10037

I can sort of understand people being about seeing headhunters post
to net-news.  Back before I felt the need to enter the real world,
I was very anti-profit.  When I went to a headhunter, I had some
reservations.  But I must say, I could not have been happier with
the job my headhunter did for me.  I can't imagine myself having found a
better company to work for than the one I am with, and they seem to
be pretty pleased with me, too.  Not only that, the amount of effort I 
had to expend was minimal.  When it's time to change jobs, I'm going
back to my headhunter.  I look at it this way: I specialize in
writing software, and my headhunter specializes in finding jobs.
We each do our respective things >40 hours a week.  Why shouldn't I
let her do what she's good at?

Random