Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site trwrba.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!psuvax1!burdvax!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!ries
From: ries@trwrba.UUCP (Marc Ries)
Newsgroups: net.jokes
Subject: Net.Auto [joke]
Message-ID: <1782@trwrba.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-Jan-86 18:34:47 EST
Article-I.D.: trwrba.1782
Posted: Thu Jan  9 18:34:47 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Jan-86 07:49:39 EST
Reply-To: ries@trwrba.UUCP (Marc Ries)
Organization: TRW Operations and Support Group
Lines: 18

This was in net.autos.
Seems to me net.jokes deserves it:

>In article  <2101@phri.UUCP>  fritz@phri.UUCP  (Dave  Fritzinger)
>writes:
>
>>If you want something that handles half decently, I would  avoid
>>muscle cars like the plague...  Breaking systems also tend to be
>>rather  dubious,  since  these   cars  are  heavy,  with   break
>>technology from the sixties.
>
>The best  breaking system  I have  ever seen  was on  an old  '67
>Ambassador (AMC).    I  found  its breaking  system  to  be  very
>reliable, as the  car stayed broken  the whole time  I owned  it.
>Brake  technology  was  standard  1960's,  but  the  car's  break
>technology was well ahead of its time.
>
>Dave Kirby    ( ...!ihnp4!akgub!cylixd!dave)