Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watmath.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!credmond
From: credmond@watmath.UUCP (Chris Redmond)
Newsgroups: net.med,net.singles,net.women
Subject: Re: Defective Condoms
Message-ID: <782@watmath.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 13-Jan-86 09:17:34 EST
Article-I.D.: watmath.782
Posted: Mon Jan 13 09:17:34 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 14-Jan-86 04:42:28 EST
References: <1105@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Reply-To: credmond@watmath.UUCP (Chris Redmond)
Distribution: na
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.med:3124 net.singles:9970 net.women:8340

>
>I was wearing the condom like a ring.  In retrospect, the increase in lubri-
>cation was the condom breaking and our making actual contact.  I probably
>should have realized it, but having only used about a dozen of the things in
>the last 10 years, it didn't occur to me until it was very much too late.
>
>
>		Is this a common occurrance?  I was using a major brand, and
>		I understood that these things are tested/inspected.  I'd be
>		interested to hear from anyone else who has had a similar
>		experience.  (Misery loves company.)
>

It happened to me twice, some years ago.  I concluded that condoms
are better than nothing, but not much better.