Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: unknown; site unknown Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!psuvax1!burdvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!pesnta!pyramid!ut-sally!topaz!caip!atux01!perry From: perry@atux01.UUCP (P. Kivolowitz) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga OS Message-ID: <142@atux01.UUCP> Date: Mon, 20-Jan-86 16:00:33 EST Article-I.D.: atux01.142 Posted: Mon Jan 20 16:00:33 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 22-Jan-86 05:33:13 EST References: <11448@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Organization: CSEd, AT&T Communications, Piscataway, N.J. Lines: 28 Summary: unix > amigados, amigados > unix arguments do not make sense Matt Dillion thinks AmigaDos is ``total shit'' and believes that Unix is the god which all o.s. must emulate. Basing his opinions on the that he professes to be an expert kernel hacker he thinks all should be thrown out (except for a few graphics routines) and we should start again. Well, Matt, I don't know if you are a Unix expert and, in fact, your exp- ertise in operating system X doesn't really bear upon the argument at hand. Unix is not Tripos. And similarly, Tripos is not Unix. I think your views are too restrictive (read that narrow minded). The answer to statements like ``Unix is great because...and AmigaDos is shit because...'' are senseless and without worth. The two operating systems address different needs. Maybe you are a UNIX expert, Matt, but you definately are not an AmigaDos expert. In many ways, the kernel underlying the nifty imagery, possess truely state-of-the-art concepts in operating system design. You'd see that too if you'd not look through Unix colored glasses. --------------- No personal aspersions intended here nor do I believe any were cast. And, I don't know why you couldn't get in a disk access while other processes were going on - but I'd suggest it was something you were doing wrong since examples of doing just that abound - like running musicraft while copying or formatting disks. Perry S. Kivolowitz