Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amiga.amiga.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!amiga!bruceb
From: bruceb@amiga.UUCP (Bruce Barrett)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: COMSPEC ... Warning: Somewhat commercial
Message-ID: <603@amiga.amiga.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 23-Jan-86 19:42:40 EST
Article-I.D.: amiga.603
Posted: Thu Jan 23 19:42:40 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jan-86 07:40:10 EST
References: <1099@ecsvax.UUCP> <11403@watnot.UUCP>
Reply-To: bruceb@amiga.UUCP (Bruce Barrett)
Distribution: net
Organization: Commodore-Amiga Inc., 983 University Ave #D, Los Gatos CA 95030
Lines: 16
Keywords: COMSPEC, memory board

In article <11403@watnot.UUCP> rmariani@watnot.UUCP (Rico Mariani) writes:
>-commercial programs don't all work from ram: mostly the problems happen
>	with programs that are too stupid to ask for chip memory when
>	they need it (see my other article)...  I don't think it would
						======================
>	be wise to name names.  
	======================

I disagree!  To me it is much more important to know what programs do
not run on a 1 meg(+) machine than which are copy protected.  Lets:
	a) name names
	b) send cards, letters and phone calls to the offenders
	c) Have every developer test their software in a >512k machine.

--Bruce Barrett
(My optinions, of course)