Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ssc-vax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!qantel!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!keith
From: keith@ssc-vax.UUCP (Keith Nemitz)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari
Subject: Re: Amiga text
Message-ID: <475@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 15-Jan-86 16:15:38 EST
Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.475
Posted: Wed Jan 15 16:15:38 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 24-Jan-86 07:53:13 EST
References: <868@h-sc1.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA
Lines: 13
Xref: linus net.micro.amiga:5458 net.micro.atari:2339

> is far more stable, clear, and readable than text on the IBM color monitor,
> the Macintosh, or almost any other micro-computer level color monitor I've
       ^ ^ ^ ^                                             ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
> seen.  I have not seen 520ST monochrome text; I hear it's very sharp.  But

    Are you color blind by some odd stretch of the imagination?  The mac's
screen is still the most readable because of apparent resolution and fonts.
Last time I saw an ST displaying fonts they were all clipped to 8x8 pixels.
The amiga has fonts, but only if each application supports THAT KIND of fonts.
Thank EA for IFF.

                                  keith
                                  A9F4