Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!amdcad!lll-crg!topaz!harvard!olson From: olson@harvard.UUCP (Eric Olson) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: Mac+ & HD20 vs Hyperdrive? Message-ID: <640@harvard.UUCP> Date: Wed, 22-Jan-86 12:58:46 EST Article-I.D.: harvard.640 Posted: Wed Jan 22 12:58:46 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 24-Jan-86 09:29:38 EST References: <1190@utai.UUCP> Reply-To: olson@harvard.UUCP (Eric olson) Organization: Aiken Comp Lab, Harvard Lines: 27 My impression of the HD20 is that it cannot be faster than a Hyperdrive. I have no experience with the Warp drive, but I suspect the HD20 is slower than it as well. Here's why: The HD20 + New Roms is changing too many variables at once. Presumably, if you use new Roms you use a new System too. So, the ROMs contain 64K of more stuff that needn't be loaded from disk, an HFS so you needn't build a whole desktop each time you go into Finder, etc. These speed enhancements are not due to the HD20! The HD20, by itself, should be faster than anything going through a serial port, slower than anything directly connected to the processor bus (like Hyperdrive and Warp Drive), and probably slower than anything connected to the (just announced) SCSI port. The current HD20 connects to the external drive port, and therefore has to go through many more protocol conversions than a Hyperdrive/Warpdrive. When the HD20 is available in an SCSI version, it will likely be competitive in terms of speed. Until then, any speed advantage Apple claims is due to the new Roms and System (and HFS), so a Hyperdrive or Warp Drive running the new Roms/System/HFS should still be faster. I'm not sure what software Hyperdrive will run with (or what Roms), but I am sure that they will come out with an HFS compatible Hyperdrive (software) soon. Personally, I am more than happy with the Hyperdrive running the old software, since there IS a fair amount of stuff that I use that won't work right on a HFS machine. -Eric.