Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!psuvax1!burdvax!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.lang.c,net.wanted
Subject: Re: need recommendation on IBM PC version of \"make\"
Message-ID: <973@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 21-Jan-86 11:17:48 EST
Article-I.D.: psivax.973
Posted: Tue Jan 21 11:17:48 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 23-Jan-86 09:31:10 EST
References: <1037@bnl44.UUCP> <162@hadron.UUCP> <348@3comvax.UUCP> <866@watmath.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Distribution: net
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 16
Keywords: lint make MS-DOS - BLATANT COMMERCIALISM
Xref: watmath net.micro.pc:6627 net.lang.c:7629 net.wanted:7984

In article <866@watmath.UUCP> jmsellens@watmath.UUCP (John M Sellens) writes:
>
>[Good stuff about C-Ware Make - which Mr. Sellens wrote]
>
>To be honest, I'm surprised that PolyMake and Lattice Make sell for so much
>more $$.  I have heard disparaging remarks about both.
>
        Anyone have any comments about the 'make' that comes with
MASM 4.0? Good or bad? Is it one of the above, or is it a seperate
Microsoft version?
--

                                Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen
ARPA: ttidca!psivax!friesen@rand-unix.arpa