Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 +SENDMAIL+2.11; site dcl-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!mcvax!ukc!dcl-cs!stephen
From: stephen@dcl-cs.UUCP (Stephen J. Muir)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Results of net.sources.mac poll
Message-ID: <913@dcl-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 12-Jan-86 15:57:43 EST
Article-I.D.: dcl-cs.913
Posted: Sun Jan 12 15:57:43 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 14-Jan-86 05:56:52 EST
References: <1747@cbosgd.UUCP>
Reply-To: stephen@comp.lancs.ac.uk (Stephen J. Muir)
Organization: Department of Computing at Lancaster University.
Lines: 15
Xpath: ukc eagle

In article <1747@cbosgd.UUCP> mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton) writes:
>(3) We encourage the distribution of BOTH source and binary, with a
>mechanism yet to be determined.  (For example, the author might send
>binary to the moderator, who would archive it and post the binary.
>The source would be available on request from the author.)

I would much rather see the distribution of SOURCE only, unless it is
unavailable for some reason, in which case it should be BINARY only.
I am purely interested in volume and not content.
-- 
UUCP:	...!seismo!mcvax!ukc!dcl-cs!stephen
DARPA:	stephen%comp.lancs.ac.uk@ucl-cs	| Post: University of Lancaster,
JANET:	stephen@uk.ac.lancs.comp	|	Department of Computing,
Phone:	+44 524 65201 Ext. 4599		|	Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK.
Project:Alvey ECLIPSE Distribution	|	LA1 4YR