Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site calma.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!sun!calma!radzy
From: radzy@calma.UUCP (Tim Radzykewycz)
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re:  Re: Easy languages
Message-ID: <130@calma.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 18-Jan-86 12:40:21 EST
Article-I.D.: calma.130
Posted: Sat Jan 18 12:40:21 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 21-Jan-86 01:02:11 EST
References: <10132@tardis.UUCP> <771@spar.UUCP>
Reply-To: radzy@calma.UUCP (Tim Radzykewycz)
Organization: GE/Calma Co., R&D Systems Engineering, Milpitas, CA
Lines: 26

In article <771@spar.UUCP> ellis@spar.UUCP (Michael Ellis) writes:
>>Even in English, which unfortunately lacks a lot of the necessary
>>grammatical machinery, ... - Thomas

>    What necessary machinery does English lack?

(-: (-: (-: (-: (-: (-: (-: (-: (-: (-: (-: (-:

I'd love to let you know what necessary machinery English lacks,
but unfortunately, I'm unable, since the machinery in question
is *necessary*, and this discussion is, of course, in English.

How about:
English fehlt einige gewichte Sachen, sowie ....

:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)

How could English *possibly* lack something necessary and still
be in use?  Perhaps "Thomas" should rephrase his statement, or
maybe try thinking before posting.

(-: "type 'Pnews', insert foot" :-)
-- 
Tim (radzy) Radzykewycz, The Incredible Radical Cabbage.
	calma!radzy@ucbvax.ARPA
	{ucbvax,sun,csd-gould}!calma!radzy