Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site mit-vax.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!qantel!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!think!mit-eddie!mit-vax!oaf From: oaf@mit-vax.UUCP (Oded Feingold) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Legal Drinking Age Message-ID: <63@mit-vax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 14-Jan-86 19:50:36 EST Article-I.D.: mit-vax.63 Posted: Tue Jan 14 19:50:36 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 19-Jan-86 20:59:03 EST Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA Lines: 32 In the mind-60s I phoned in to a radio talk show. The topic under discussion was _lowering_ the drinking age to 18 so our brave boys could die with alcohol in their bloodstreams. I opposed it. My reasoning was that society must due two things to educate its population: ------------------------------ 1. Keep the majority of people in violation of the law most of the time, so when the cops want to get them they have a convenient handle. [Examples: 55 mph speed limits (imposed much later, of course), proscriptions against spitting on the sidewalk, loitering and jaywalking, etc.] 2. Inform them that they may be legislated into a subservient position at the whim of the legislature, and that they must not assume they have the right to oppose or live independently of the state. Certainly imposing an alcohol ban on draftable people is a good reminder of unprivileged status. ------------------------------ The host argued vigorously with me, claiming that the great US society did not indulge in such treatment of anybody, let alone its own citizens. [That in 1965 - voting rights had been legislated but not implemented for Blacks across the south, let alone any issues of desegregating Boston schools. Heh heh.] My belief in those tenets grows stronger, year by year. What's YOUR excuse? -- Oded Feingold MIT AI Lab. 545 Tech Square Cambridge, Mass. 02139 OAF%OZ@MIT-MC.ARPA {harvard, ihnp4!mit-eddie}!mitvax!oaf 617-253-8598