Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mmintl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!pesnta!pyramid!decwrl!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!cmcl2!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
From: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Enforceable agreement
Message-ID: <1058@mmintl.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 18-Jan-86 16:31:16 EST
Article-I.D.: mmintl.1058
Posted: Sat Jan 18 16:31:16 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 24-Jan-86 22:29:44 EST
References: <696@cylixd.UUCP>
Reply-To: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT
Lines: 17


In article <696@cylixd.UUCP> dave@cylixd.UUCP (Dave Kirby) writes:
>In article <204@aero.ARPA> foy@aero.UUCP (Richard Foy) writes:
>
>>How about an ENFORCEABLE agreement to cut nuclear arms to 50%?
>
>If we can make it truly enforceable, let's cut them all the way to 0.

Well, for one thing, the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. can make a treaty to cut
nuclear weapons 50%.  To cut them to 0, you had better include at least
Britain, France, and China.  Also you want to get the current non-
signatories to sign the Non-proliferation Treaty.

All in all, the prospect makes getting a 50% reduction look easy by
contrast.

Frank Adams                           ihpn4!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
Multimate International    52 Oakland Ave North    E. Hartford, CT 06108