Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!gatech!ut-sally!seismo!umcp-cs!dday
From: dday@umcp-cs.UUCP (Dennis Doubleday)
Newsgroups: net.sport.football
Subject: Re: /Oklahoma/Pac-10
Message-ID: <2717@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 10-Jan-86 16:33:42 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.2717
Posted: Fri Jan 10 16:33:42 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 13-Jan-86 01:09:04 EST
References: <30400016@ISM780B.UUCP>
Reply-To: dday@maryland.UUCP (Dennis Doubleday)
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 22

In article <30400016@ISM780B.UUCP> jimb@ISM780B.UUCP writes:
>As for USC, yes UCLA coughed up a loss to a weaker team.  How many times has
>Pitt knocked off a superior Penn St. team?  My mother is a Penn St. alumnus
>and is sick of the number of times it happened.  When a game is one of
>intense rivalry, ANYTHING can happen.  As for the Pac-10 schedule, it's no
>cakewalk.  I respect every school except Oregon St.
 
I'm glad for you.  We Big 8ers have a little more trouble respecting 
Oregon than you do, after we watch Nebraska crush them 63-0.  I don't
think the Pac 10 is any stronger than the Big 8.  Both conferences have
about half the teams having a good-to-great year and half the teams
having a good-to-miserable year, year in and year out.  UCLA's schedule
was no tougher than Oklahoma's.  Both teams played 3 teams that ended
up in the top 20, several respectable teams, and several lousy teams.
So what is this garbage (in another posting by you) about moving
Oklahoma down to #5 to adjust for their easy schedule?
-- 

UUCP:	seismo!umcp-cs!dday                      Dennis Doubleday
CSNet:	dday@umcp-cs				 University of Maryland
ARPA:	dday@gymble.umd.edu			 College Park, MD 20742
Fan of: Chicago Cubs, Chicago Bears, OU Sooners	 (301) 454-4247