Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site ISM780B.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!decvax!ISM780B!jimb From: jimb@ISM780B.UUCP Newsgroups: net.sport.football Subject: Re: Re: Rose Bowl tv rating Message-ID: <30400023@ISM780B.UUCP> Date: Mon, 13-Jan-86 13:13:00 EST Article-I.D.: ISM780B.30400023 Posted: Mon Jan 13 13:13:00 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 15-Jan-86 01:07:33 EST References: <2713@umcp-cs.UUCP> Lines: 39 Nf-ID: #R:umcp-cs:-271300:ISM780B:30400023:000:1500 Nf-From: ISM780B!jimb Jan 13 13:13:00 1986 >The high rating of the Rose Bowl says nothing about the quality of the game. >In the first place, people who tune in to a game don't know ahead of time >whether it'll be any good or not. In the second place, the Rose Bowl is the >only one of the New Year's Day bowls to run unopposed by another game, so of >course its rating will be higher. I think that the Rose Bowl out drew the Sugar Bowl and Orange Bowl combined; if not, it was very close. >I read the other day that the Sugar Bowl committee is thinking of changing >the starting time of its game to oppose the Rose Bowl next year. They're >tired getting blown out annually by the Orange Bowl and would rather oppose >a bowl of regional significance which hasn't produced the national champion >in any recent year. -- This should have been posted to net.jokes. I suppose that last year's national championship being decided by BYU in the Holiday Bowl made it a premier bowl? Regional significance, my ***#$&! As long as the top Pac-10 and Big-10 teams are meeting, it may or may not decide the national championship, but it will still be a VIG. (Why this sticking point, Dennis? Your article on the Bears-Giants game was so insightful and masterful.) >UUCP: seismo!umcp-cs!dday Dennis Doubleday -- from the bewildered musings of Jim Brunet {ihnp4, decvax}!ima!jimb (most reliable) ihnp4!vortex!ism780!jimb or jimb at ima/*cca-unix.arpa ^ this asterisk is necessary!