Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site iddic.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!iddic!richr
From: richr@iddic.UUCP (Rich Rodgers)
Newsgroups: net.sport.football
Subject: Re: Playoff experience and Bears in '86
Message-ID: <2359@iddic.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 17-Jan-86 12:49:07 EST
Article-I.D.: iddic.2359
Posted: Fri Jan 17 12:49:07 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 20-Jan-86 04:02:02 EST
References: <468@tekchips.UUCP> <885@cybvax0.UUCP> <472@gymble.UUCP>
Reply-To: richr@iddic.UUCP (Rich Rodgers)
Distribution: net
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 28
Summary: 

In article <472@gymble.UUCP> dday@gymble.UUCP (Dennis Doubleday) writes:
>
>Bears team.  Ditka's record in 4 years as coach: 3-6, 8-8, 11-7, 17-1 (so
>far this year).  Next year??  19-0 ??  Don't laugh, it could happen!
>Fan of: Chicago Cubs, Chicago Bears, OU Sooners	 (301) 454-6154

This is the same reasoning given by the San Francisco 49ers fans at the end
of last season, and look what happened.  The one constant in the NFL is that
each year will see upsets.  Don't count your chickens...

On another note,
   It seems to me that the last team that could not possibly lose the Super
Bowl probably did.  The famous Baltimore-New York Jets Joe Namath fiasco
comes to mind.  The Jets weren't given a chance, yet won.  

   I personally think that Chicago is the better team on any given day,
but all the people who say that New England does not have a chance are either
not looking at history, or are talking with blinders on.

I hope the overconfident Bears are prepared to eat their hats,
Then again, maybe not...

Go Niners, 
Go SeaHawks,
-- 
				Rich Rodgers

				tektronix!iddic!richr