Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/12/84; site nbs-amrf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!amdcad!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!nbs-amrf!libes
From: libes@nbs-amrf.UUCP (Don Libes)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: Re:  Wollongoing subnet support (sic)
Message-ID: <110@nbs-amrf.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 16-Jan-86 21:16:59 EST
Article-I.D.: nbs-amrf.110
Posted: Thu Jan 16 21:16:59 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Jan-86 08:34:50 EST
References: <1591@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Organization: National Bureau of Standards
Lines: 20

>                                                        ....   He had
> never even heard of the subnet spec, and I had to give him the RFC
> numbers. Apparently part of the problem is that there isn't a good
> path to get info about changes like this to companies if they aren't
> on the Internet. Perhaps a path exists for getting the existing RFC
> announcements into a UUCP group, e.g. net.rfcs? That would help these
> people.
> 
> 	Noel

No, it wouldn't help Wollongong, since they are not on Usenet
either.  In fact, they have not had a uucp connection for several
years now.  (They can't get it running!)  This lack of communication
is truly amazing for a company whose primary product is network
software.

(And if you think their support for TCP/IP is bad, let me tell you
about their support for Eunice...)

Don Libes      {seismo,umcp-cs}!nbs-amrf!libes