Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site decwrl.DEC.COM
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-galaxy!malik
From: malik@galaxy.DEC (Karl Malik ZK01-1/F22 1-1440)
Newsgroups: net.veg
Subject: meat vs nomeat
Message-ID: <492@decwrl.DEC.COM>
Date: Thu, 16-Jan-86 18:30:52 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.492
Posted: Thu Jan 16 18:30:52 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 18-Jan-86 07:46:43 EST
Sender: kiefer@decwrl.DEC.COM
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 19


Subj; the ongoing vegetarian vs. carnivore debate


	Not to continue the argument, but hopefully to end it --

	It is exactly like the abortion issue - There are *NO*
facts that could *ever* come to light that would settle the 
issue.

	Both sides are simply rationalizing an aesthetic position.
And, as has been said, there is no accounting for taste.

	So, give it a rest, folks.

						- Karl

p.s. if you feel like debating this, do it by MAIL not in this
newsgroup.