Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!caip!vax135!ariel!mtunf!solar!news
From: news@solar.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.works
Subject: Moderated newsgroup
Message-ID: <1028@caip.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Sun, 19-Jan-86 17:47:31 EST
Article-I.D.: caip.1028
Posted: Sun Jan 19 17:47:31 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 21-Jan-86 01:08:58 EST
Sender: daemon@caip.RUTGERS.EDU
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 41

From: vax135!ariel!mtunf!solar!news@ucbvax.berkeley.edu

This newsgroup is moderated, and cannot be posted to directly.
Please mail your article to the moderator for posting.
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site solar.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: solar!orion!mtunf!mtuni!mtunh!ariel!vax135!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!ulysses!ucbvax!works
From: GUTFREUND@UMASS-CS.CSNET ("Steven H. Gutfreund")
Newsgroups: mod.computers.workstations
Subject: Network chaos
Message-ID: <8601162259.AA15299@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 15-Jan-86 09:23:00 EST
Article-I.D.:   ucbvax.8601162259.AA15299
Posted: Wed Jan 15 09:23:00 1986
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 22
Approved: works@red.rutgers.edu


Does anyone have any comments about the new consortium formed to
produce a uniform network model (file servers, print servers, etc)
among all computer vendors (except IBM). Bell, DEC, Burroughs, CDC,
etc announced this effort in the last week.

My feeling was this was not so much a technical move (there is a lot
of room for innovation in the area of servers, especially when one
realizes that in the future there will be voice-servers,
video-servers, parrallel process servers - and locking oneself into a
standard across hybred operating systems will constrain all operating
system development at these firms).

The actual move seems to have been more marketing focused. I think
everyone was shocked when they woke up and realized that in one day,
IBM could say no, they would not go ethernet with the PC, they would
go ring - and all the Interlan's and 3-Coms and Apples of the world
would have to dance to IBM's tune. This effort seems to be aimed at
coming up with a marketing counterforce to keep IBM from making SNA a
defacto standard.

                                                - Steve