Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utcs.uucp Path: utzoo!utcs!shindman From: shindman@utcs.uucp (Paul Shindman) Newsgroups: ont.uucp Subject: Re: news feed & NETNORTH/BITNET Message-ID: <1041@utcs.uucp> Date: Mon, 6-Jan-86 09:54:04 EST Article-I.D.: utcs.1041 Posted: Mon Jan 6 09:54:04 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 6-Jan-86 10:14:13 EST References: <1886@utcsri.UUCP> Reply-To: shindman@utcs.UUCP (Paul Shindman) Distribution: ont Organization: University of Toronto - General Purpose UNIX Lines: 32 Summary: Unfortunately the guidelines governing the use of NETNORTH/BITNET preclude this type of feed. I would be *very* upset if this started for the following reasons: -the rules say so. To quote for the usage guidelines "All usage of BITNET must be consistent with its goal to facilitate the exchange of non-commercial information in support of a member institution's mission of education and research". As far as I know, NETNORTH has adopted the BITNET guidelines. -even if you could convince me that net.*.*.* was "consistent with" etc, NETNORTH/BITNET is a 'store and forward' type network with only one unique path to each node. USENET garbage would quickly grind the network, as well as everyone's spool, to a halt. For example, if York crashed, the news for Humber College, McMaster, and Laurentian (as well as several York nodes) would pile up at Guelph. So multiply net.sources.mac and net.sources by the number of receiving sites # downstream from York and the spool at Guelph quickly fills. -NETNORTH/BITNET already has several moderated discussion groups. At present these are restricted to technical issues dealing with the network. There is nothing preventing individuals from having their own private mailings on topics of their choice. So that's my opinion, of course. -- ----------------- Paul Shindman, U of T Computing Services, Toronto (416) 978-6878 USENET: {ihnp4|decvax}!utcs!shindman BITNET: paulie at utoronto IP SHARP MAIL: uoft