Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site humming.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!humming!arturo
From: arturo@humming.UUCP (Arturo Perez)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Turntables
Message-ID: <110@humming.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 2-Feb-86 14:33:55 EST
Article-I.D.: humming.110
Posted: Sun Feb  2 14:33:55 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 4-Feb-86 00:47:10 EST
References: <771@decwrl.DEC.COM> <148@catnip.UUCP>
Reply-To: harvard!humming!woody!arturo
Distribution: na
Organization: Kurzweil A.I. Waltham, Mass.
Lines: 6
Keywords: turntable mats.
Summary: What difference does the mat make?

The current discussion about turntables has reminded of a question I have
about turntable mats. I recently bought a Dual 505-II (which is a vast
improvement over my Sony - I love it!) and I replaced the mat it came with
with an anti-static mat. A friend pointed out that the mat might be there
for more reasons than just to keep the record from slipping. Is there any
truth to this?