Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site inmet.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!inmet!shelley
From: shelley@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.aviation
Subject: Re: Re: IFR Currency
Message-ID: <16400005@inmet.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 23-Jan-86 13:39:00 EST
Article-I.D.: inmet.16400005
Posted: Thu Jan 23 13:39:00 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 26-Jan-86 17:09:54 EST
References: <979@terak.UUCP>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:terak:-97900:inmet:16400005:000:559
Nf-From: inmet!shelley    Jan 23 13:39:00 1986


Good VFR navigation does NOT preclude the use of nav instrumentation.
It's true that the more information one is provided, the more difficult
the task of interpretation, but you also tend to get a more accurate
or reliable solution.  Personally, I try to use everything available for
navigation, plane or boat.  I'd rather be busy than worried.

Steve Shelley
Intermetrics Inc.
Cambridge MA

PS -- Lock Haven is easier to find if you're IFR (I follow river) rather
than IFI (I follow Interstate).  Matter of fact, it's been UNDER the river
a couple of times.