Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!ut-sally!seismo!riacs!julian From: julian@riacs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.aviation Subject: Re: Missing Man Formation Message-ID: <176@riacs.ARPA> Date: Fri, 7-Feb-86 17:54:24 EST Article-I.D.: riacs.176 Posted: Fri Feb 7 17:54:24 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Feb-86 03:28:13 EST References: <1072@utcs.uucp> <681@brl-smoke.ARPA> Distribution: net Organization: RIACS, Moffett Field, CA Lines: 42 > There is something that has always confused me about the "missing man > formation" -- it always appears to me that there are *two* "missing" > planes in the formation. The way I've seen it, most recently, is that > there are four planes in a *partial* "V" formation, like this: > > ^ > ^ ^ > ^ > > And then the second one pulls off and away, leaving: > > ^ > ^ > ^ > > However, that still looks to me like TWO "missing " aircraft from what > should be: > > ^ > ^ ^ > ^ ^ > > I suppose there is some explanation, related to there being four aircraft > in some standard military unit, but it isn't clear to the general viewer. > I would think it would be more effective if they started off with the > five aircraft in a fully-formed "V", and then the second one split off, > leaving a clear single-craft gap. > > Am I right in those layouts above? I've only seen this on TV, and the > angles of shots don't always give a clear view of the true formation. > > Will One standard four aircraft formation is "fingertip" (spread out your hand and see where the fingertips are). That's what is used for the "missing man" ceremony. -- "If Chaos himself sat umpire, what better could he do?" Julian "a tribble took it" Gomez (ARPA: julian@riacs) 415-694-6141 415-694-6363 (UUCP: decvax!decwrl!julian@riacs) RIACS - Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science