Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sdcc6.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!ix826
From: ix826@sdcc6.UUCP (tim drabik)
Newsgroups: net.bicycle
Subject: Opinions on Specialized and Ofmega triple cranks sought
Message-ID: <2416@sdcc6.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 10-Feb-86 12:25:57 EST
Article-I.D.: sdcc6.2416
Posted: Mon Feb 10 12:25:57 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Feb-86 04:48:07 EST
Distribution: na
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 18

I'm rebuilding my bike from the ground up, and will probably choose
between the Specialized and Ofmega triple cranks.  Any comments about
the quality, finish, and chainring wearability of said cranks?  The
Ofmega has a convenient design inasmuch as the spider is simply drilled
to accept mounts for the small ring.  The bolt circle for the larger
rings is the same as on Ofmega's two-piece crank, which is compatible
with Campy chainrings.

Also, without opening the can of worms again, can someone summarize the
consensus on Huret Duo-par and corresponding front derailleurs?

I'll post a summary on the cranks if it seems worthwhile.

					Thanks in advance,
					Tim Drabik
					UC Sandy Eggo Applied Physics
					...sdcsvax!sdcc6!ix826
					ix826%sdcc6@SDCSVAX