Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hropus.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!hropus!ka
From: ka@hropus.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards,net.bugs.usg
Subject: Re: Why does xargs limit argument-sizes to 470 bytes?
Message-ID: <248@hropus.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Feb-86 12:03:48 EST
Article-I.D.: hropus.248
Posted: Thu Feb  6 12:03:48 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 7-Feb-86 21:27:30 EST
References: <2721@amdahl.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 8
Xref: watmath net.unix-wizards:16682 net.bugs.usg:438

The reason that xargs uses such a small limit is undoubtedly that is
was never changed when the maximum arg list size that exec would handle
was changed from 512 to 5120.  One of the reasons that xargs was written
was to deal with the 512 byte limitation.  I very rarely hit the 5120
byte limit.
				Kenneth Almquist
				ihnp4!houxm!hropus!ka	(official name)
				ihnp4!opus!ka		(shorter path)