Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekig5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!tekig5!halb
From: halb@tekig5.UUCP (Hal Bates)
Newsgroups: net.columbia
Subject: Re: Challenger Destruct
Message-ID: <464@tekig5.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 1-Feb-86 23:06:18 EST
Article-I.D.: tekig5.464
Posted: Sat Feb  1 23:06:18 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 3-Feb-86 05:06:59 EST
References: <1732@bbnccv.UUCP>
Reply-To: halb@tekig5tes.UUCP (Hal Bates)
Distribution: net
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 17

In article <1732@bbnccv.UUCP> rfradenb@bbnccv.UUCP (Roger Fradenburgh) writes:
>
>In article <540@ihlpl.UUCP> feustel@ihlpl.UUCP (Feustel) writes:
>>Is it possible that Challenger was blown with a laser-beam weapon?
>
>Is it possible you're serious?

The laser idea is weird, however, I am suprised that some Arab nut hasnt 
claimed to have planted a bomb. Seems most logical to me that they would 
try get some free press. And the press would have been more than glad to 
host the idea. I better stop before I get carried away discussing my 
feelings about our media, you know, the ones that butchered the Challenger's 
exit.

Im still bummed - but lets get going

tektronix!tekig5!halb