Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcsb Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucdcsb!kenny From: kenny@uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU Newsgroups: net.columbia Subject: Re: Challenger SRBs Message-ID: <6800015@uiucdcsb> Date: Sun, 2-Feb-86 13:09:00 EST Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.6800015 Posted: Sun Feb 2 13:09:00 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 5-Feb-86 07:06:58 EST References: <4270@mhuxd.UUCP> Lines: 29 Nf-ID: #R:mhuxd.UUCP:4270:uiucdcsb:6800015:000:1458 Nf-From: uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU!kenny Feb 2 12:09:00 1986 As a follow-up to this discussion, NASA confirmed yesterday that the conical object recovered from the sea was an SRB nosecone. The recovery parachute had, in fact, deployed normally. The separation motors were still intact, implying that Scobee and Smith had not attempted to blow the SRB's and ditch the External Tank, which would have been the procedure they would have followed if they had had warning of the impending explosion. In the same press release, NASA acknowledged the sighting of abnormal flames forward of the nozzle of one SRB (visible as early as 0:58 after launch from some camera angles) and confirmed a drop in combustion-chamber pressure in that SRB consistent with a flame leak. NASA spokesman Hugh Harris refused to speculate as to the significance of this finding and stated that these observations were ``an area of interest; not the only area of interest''. Does anybody recall discussion in this newsgroup several months ago about a near-disastrous fault in an SRB on an earlier flight which nearly caused a burnthrough shortly before SRB sep? Does anyone still have a transcript of that discussion, or at least remember the salient points? k**2 Kevin Kenny University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign UUCP: {ihnp4,pur-ee,convex}!uiucdcs!kenny CSNET: kenny@UIUC.CSNET ARPA: kenny@B.CS.UIUC.EDU (kenny@UIUC.ARPA) "Yes, understanding today's complex world is a bit like having bees live in your head, but there they are."