Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!ut-sally!topaz!uwvax!hagens
From: hagens@uwvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.columbia
Subject: SRB vs liquid
Message-ID: <615@uwvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Feb-86 10:59:37 EST
Article-I.D.: uwvax.615
Posted: Tue Feb  4 10:59:37 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Feb-86 20:42:13 EST
Organization: U of Wisconsin CS Dept
Lines: 12

On the news last night (McNeal, Leherer (sp)) two gentlemen 
were disagreeing on the safty of a SRB vs. liquid fuel rocket. It
was implied that due to NASA budget restrictions, SRBs were used
when liquid fuel was better/safer.

Whats the scoop on this? Is there any truth to it?

Rob Hagens
-- 
Rob Hagens @ wisconsin
...!{allegra,heurikon,ihnp4,seismo,sfwin,ucbvax,uwm-evax}!uwvax!hagens
hagens@wisc-rsch.arpa