Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!ut-sally!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!jlg
From: jlg@lanl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.columbia
Subject: Re: Re: A new Shuttle to replace Challenger
Message-ID: <750@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 4-Feb-86 14:28:34 EST
Article-I.D.: lanl.750
Posted: Tue Feb  4 14:28:34 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Feb-86 21:17:37 EST
References: <509@anasazi.UUCP> <505@mot.UUCP> <377@dolqci.UUCP> <224@imagen.UUCP> <271@tolerant.UUCP>
Reply-To: jlg@a.UUCP (Jim Giles)
Distribution: net
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 13

In article <271@tolerant.UUCP> berry@tolerant.UUCP (David Berry) writes:
>> May I suggest that a new shuttle, once built, be named
>> the Space Shuttle McAuliffe.
>> 
>
>	Why not the Scobee... or the Smith... or the Onizuka... or
>       Resnik, McNair, or Jarvis.  ...

Sounds good to me!  We could use all of them.  The Shuttle fleet would
certainly be up to strength.

J. Giles
Los Alamos