Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ttidcb.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!linus!philabs!ttidca!ttidcb!cushner From: cushner@ttidcb.UUCP (Jeffrey Cushner) Newsgroups: net.columbia Subject: Re: A new Shuttle: What Name? Message-ID: <677@ttidcb.UUCP> Date: Mon, 10-Feb-86 13:24:18 EST Article-I.D.: ttidcb.677 Posted: Mon Feb 10 13:24:18 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 12-Feb-86 20:58:59 EST References: <6372@utzoo.UUCP> Reply-To: cushner@ttidcb.UUCP (Jeffrey Cushner) Organization: Transaction Technology, Inc. (CitiCorp), Santa Monica Lines: 49 Summary: In article <6372@utzoo.UUCP> kcarroll@utzoo.UUCP (Kieran A. Carroll) writes: >(per aspera, ad astra) > >Keep in mind that the names of most of the shuttles >are the names of old sailing ships. There is no taboo >against re-using the name of a ship that has been >lost, as far as I know. Personally, I think that >since the name "Challenger" is now unused by any >space-going vehicle, it'd be appropriate to put a >proud name back in circulation. Perhaps not >for the new space shuttle, as that'd cause potential >confusion for future historians (was that the Challenger >that exploded, or the other one...?). Of course, >you could name the new shuttle "Challenger II". >References: <2911@ut-ngp.UUCP> > >-- > > Kieran A. Carroll @ U of Toronto Aerospace Institute > {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!kcarroll Then why hasn't anyone named a craft the USS Titanic or the USS Hindenburgh(sp), for example? Also, I have a gripe. With the voluminous postings to wade through, why do I have to 'n' through duplicate articles through Net.space and Net.columbia? Please folks, only post to ONE newsgroup. Do you really think that readers are only going to read the one to which you DON'T post? Thank you for your cooperation, Reduntantly Yours, -- ============================================================================== Jeff Cushner @ Citicorp-TTI Santa Monica CA 90405 (213) 450-9111 x2273 {randvax,trwrb,vortex,philabs}!ttidca!ttidcb!cushner ********************************************************************* ** The above comments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of ** ** Citicorp-TTI and if the corporation wants them to, they'll have ** ** to pay through the nose for the rights! ** *********************************************************************