Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site burl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!rcj
From: rcj@burl.UUCP (Curtis Jackson)
Newsgroups: net.legal,net.jobs
Subject: Re: Is this company breaking the law with it's employees?
Message-ID: <979@burl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 31-Jan-86 10:12:37 EST
Article-I.D.: burl.979
Posted: Fri Jan 31 10:12:37 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 1-Feb-86 06:18:08 EST
References: <108@graffiti.UUCP> <1967@gondor.UUCP> <1009@loral.UUCP> <452@faron.UUCP> <454@faron.UUCP>
Reply-To: rcj@burl.UUCP (Curtis Jackson)
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Technologies, Burlington NC
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.legal:2843 net.jobs:1811
Summary: 

In article <454@faron.UUCP> rjd@faron.UUCP (Robert DeBenedictis) writes:
>To answer my own question, it IS EDS!
>
>I had an interview with them this morning.  I can't confirm anything about
>having to work long hours, but they told me that when I accepted the job I
>would have to sign a promisary note saying I would either work for 3 years
>after I completed their training or else pay them $9000.  (There were some
>other details like if you work a year and then quit you only pay $6000, etc.)
>
>Does anyone know what it's like to work for them?
>
With that kind of attitude on their part, why should you care?  Come to work
for AT&T; they are [spelled: have been for me] great!  I've even worked hand-
in-hand with lots of famous people at (drum roll, please), Bell Laboratories!!
They're real people too, you know, but don't tell anyone...

BTW, the above is *not* sarcasm -- I have been very satisfied at AT&T and
for myself would never consider working for a company with restrictions like
the above.
-- 

The MAD Programmer -- 919-228-3313 (Cornet 291)
alias: Curtis Jackson	...![ ihnp4 ulysses cbosgd mgnetp ]!burl!rcj
			...![ ihnp4 cbosgd akgua masscomp ]!clyde!rcj