Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site panda.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!mrc From: mrc@panda.UUCP (Mike R. Connell) Newsgroups: net.jokes.d Subject: Re: tasteless and not rotated Space Shuttle Jokes needed Message-ID: <1360@panda.UUCP> Date: Fri, 31-Jan-86 15:30:14 EST Article-I.D.: panda.1360 Posted: Fri Jan 31 15:30:14 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Feb-86 20:43:13 EST References: <1550@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> <2581@pucc-h> <11425@watnot.UUCP> Reply-To: mrc@panda.UUCP (Mike R. Connell) Distribution: net Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass. Lines: 33 Summary: In article <11425@watnot.UUCP> rdgreenall@watnot.UUCP (Richard Greenall) writes: >> In article <1550@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> benn@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (T. Cox) writes: >> >[] >> >This is a request for the most tasteless [sic] joke to get posted >> >to the net as quickly as possible after the explosion of the >> >space shuttle. Those that mention teachers being blown up >> >will gain extra points. The award will go to the first posting >> >as shown by the news software at the originator's site. > > You've got be be kidding. I think you win unanimously. > > RDGREENALL@WATNOT.UUCP > - Richard Greenall Am I alone in perceiving the original posting as a satirical plea for *no* mindless shuttle jokes? This was the impression I got on first reading it. When the devastating news of the shuttle first reached me, I immediately (after getting a sick feeling in my stomach) thought, "Oh no, this means a nauseating spate of sick jokes on the net." In fact I have already "n"'d passed one. I was tempted to post a plea for no shuttle jokes, then thought it better to just let the subject lie and see who might start it. (it sure would tell me a lot about the people we're dealing with.) My plea probably would not have been of the tongue-in-cheek nature, but that's the way I interpreted the Cox posting. "Break on through to the other side" MRC