Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mmm.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mmm!mrgofor
From: mrgofor@mmm.UUCP (Michael Ross)
Newsgroups: net.jokes.d,net.women
Subject: Re: traditional values
Message-ID: <443@mmm.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 3-Feb-86 12:29:51 EST
Article-I.D.: mmm.443
Posted: Mon Feb  3 12:29:51 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Feb-86 04:39:33 EST
References: <263@galbp.UUCP> <418@cisden.UUCP> <1124@oddjob.UUCP> <451@cisden.UUCP> <4228CJC@PSUVM> <353@ism780c.UUCP>
Reply-To: mrgofor@mmm.UUCP (Michael Ross)
Organization: 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn.
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.jokes.d:1398 net.women:8713

In article <353@ism780c.UUCP> tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith) writes:
>In article <4228CJC@PSUVM> CJC@PSUVM.BITNET writes:
>>
>>Your "joke" insinuated that "rape" just means that the victim wasn't
>>paid enough.
>
>Wrong.  It insinuated that not getting paid enough was rape, not that
>rape was just not getting paid enough.  A is B does not imply that all
>B is A.
>

Wright, but still rong. The joke insinuated that the prostitute *thought*
not getting paid enough was rape. The joke hinges on the very fact that
not getting paid enough is NOT a definition of rape, and that's why all
of us folks who know that thought the joke was funny.

>Tim Smith       sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim || ima!ism780!tim || ihnp4!cithep!tim

--MKR