Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site whuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!stu16
From: stu16@whuxl.UUCP (Pippin)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Drugs in America  --  GRRRRRR!!!!!!
Message-ID: <993@whuxl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 13-Feb-86 14:30:47 EST
Article-I.D.: whuxl.993
Posted: Thu Feb 13 14:30:47 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Feb-86 01:44:20 EST
References: <401@ncr-sd.UUCP> <33100006@uiucuxc> <970@whuxl.UUCP> <1023@burl.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Whippany
Lines: 16

> In article <970@whuxl.UUCP> stup@whuxl.UUCP (Raggedy-Ann @ Dollhouse) writes:
> >    Employers DO like to know if employees are taking controlled
> >Rx drugs because, yes, they can affect work performance. Pain killers


      Don't laugh. Some supervisors here REALLY want to
know. If you are legally taking a drug that affects your
capability, they make allowances for that. They figure if by
taking the drug, you are able to work at all, it's better
than you having to stay home in bed, or being at work but
with lots of pain. Let's face it, wouldn't you rather your
boss know about it than have him/her upset with you because
your productivity slacked off for a bit? I would.
-- 
                      Pippin Stuart
                      whuxl!stu16