Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fisher.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!astrovax!fisher!tim From: tim@fisher.UUCP (Tim Snyder) Newsgroups: net.math Subject: Re: Non-mathematics on net.math Message-ID: <1367@fisher.UUCP> Date: Mon, 27-Jan-86 13:51:14 EST Article-I.D.: fisher.1367 Posted: Mon Jan 27 13:51:14 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 28-Jan-86 06:28:33 EST References: <11510@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Organization: Princeton University.Mathematics Lines: 38 > .... Tim announced that many people believe that such problems > are in fact mathematical. Unfortunatly, these people are wrong. I > suspect a lot of us would support the efforts of Bob Silverman or anyone else tokeep such submissions *off* of net.math, especially when the person posting > seems to be well-supplied with places to post. If the "people who post" don't > know or don't care what mathematics is, what is wrong with telling them so, > instead of "letting them decide"... > > Gene W. Smith Gene: As I mentioned before, we have more than one definition of what mathematics is. Moreover, if ANY article is posted by somebody to net.math since they believe it is mathematical in nature, one of two things can happen: (1) the other net.math subscribers will find it either non-mathematical or uninteresting and the topic will die, leaving the "net.police" happy and not wasting their time; or (2) net.math subscribers will find it to be worthwhile and will respond appropriately. In this latter case, if one becomes upset with the given topic, he can use the "n" or "u" (unsubscribe) keys. For those who believe this "meta-discussion" is not mathematical, forgive the posting. I deem it necessary to retain the integrity of the net. Let us allow people the freedom of discussing mathematics without fear of being blasted by others. Without this, the entire purpose of the net is destroyed, no? ...in the eye of the beholder... Tim Snyder