Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!rocksanne!sunybcs!kitty!larry
From: larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman)
Newsgroups: net.cooks,net.med
Subject: Re: Re: the food groups vs. the chinese
Message-ID: <799@kitty.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Feb-86 10:10:42 EST
Article-I.D.: kitty.799
Posted: Sun Feb  9 10:10:42 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 12-Feb-86 07:30:08 EST
References: <638@osiris.UUCP> <2790@sunybcs.UUCP> <386@watmum.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Recognition Research Corp., Clarence, NY
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.cooks:5932 net.med:3338

> >The most reliable rule is still to eat what appeals to you.
> 
> I don't agree with this. I know of some chemists who could (and do) whip
> up some absolutely delicious things with almost zero nutritional value.
> When people lived in caves this worked, but not any more.

	One of my favorite party tricks is to make a parody of a fast food
restaurant chocholate milk shake using a little Hershey's syrup, a LOT of
water, and some carrageenan or methyl cellulose.  It looks like a McShake,
flows like a McShake, just about tastes like a McShake, and has virtually
no food value...

==>  Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp., Clarence, New York        <==
==>  UUCP    {decvax|dual|rocksanne|rocksvax|watmath}!sunybcs!kitty!larry  <==
==>  VOICE   716/741-9185                {rice|shell}!baylor!/             <==
==>  FAX     716/741-9635 {G1, G2, G3 modes}    duke!ethos!/               <==
==>                                               seismo!/                 <==
==>  "Have you hugged your cat today?"           ihnp4!/                   <==