Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site hoptoad.uucp
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!sun!hoptoad!gnu
From: gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: AT&T - THE WRONG CHOICE
Message-ID: <504@hoptoad.uucp>
Date: Sat, 8-Feb-86 23:45:38 EST
Article-I.D.: hoptoad.504
Posted: Sat Feb  8 23:45:38 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Feb-86 06:20:38 EST
References: <1117@mmintl.UUCP>
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 14

Excerpts from article <1117@mmintl.UUCP> by petes@mmintl.UUCP (Peter Santoro):
> after the holidays he called AT&T to see why he hadn't received his PC.  They
> said, "we're sorry"
> about the long delay.  They said, "we're sorry and we'll try to get you a
> day.  It wasn't.  AT&T said, "we're sorry."  AT&T repeatedly missed 3 more
> (1984 model) PC.  He called AT&T to complain.  They said, "we're sorry."
> In the meantime, my friend has lost time and money.  AT&T's only response to
> that was "we're sorry."

At least they said they were sorry.
-- 
# I resisted cluttering my mail with signatures for years, but the mail relay
# situation has gotten to where people can't reach me without it.  Dammit!
# John Gilmore  {sun,ptsfa,lll-crg,nsc}!hoptoad!gnu    jgilmore@lll-crg.arpa