Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ism780c.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim From: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: New Atari Toy Computer Message-ID: <348@ism780c.UUCP> Date: Wed, 29-Jan-86 17:48:41 EST Article-I.D.: ism780c.348 Posted: Wed Jan 29 17:48:41 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Feb-86 04:10:34 EST References: <37@sbcs.UUCP> <148600038@uiucuxc> Reply-To: tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith) Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA Lines: 16 In article <148600038@uiucuxc> hamilton@uiucuxc.CSO.UIUC.EDU writes: >> >>Do you have any evidence for this? I have never known anyone to put >>a lower limit on what they are willing to spend, just an upper limit. > > speaking for myself, i do it all the time. for example, if i need >tools, i'll go to (eg) Sears and pay extra for Craftsman or somesuch, >instead of buying a $19.95 wonderwrench from the likes of Ronco. several It sounds like you are putting a lower limit on *quality*, not *price*. This is what I think most consumers who are considering a major purchase will do, and an Amiga is a major purchase. One should be suspicous of a deal that seems too good to be true, but if the product turns out to be good, then I think a low price will help, not hurt. -- Tim Smith sdcrdcf!ism780c!tim || ima!ism780!tim || ihnp4!cithep!tim