Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!mit-eddie!jbs
From: jbs@mit-eddie.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: AmigaDOS
Message-ID: <48@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Feb-86 00:51:10 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.48
Posted: Tue Feb  4 00:51:10 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Feb-86 20:41:59 EST
References: <1149@caip.RUTGERS.EDU> <2987@ncsu.UUCP>
Reply-To: jbs@mit-eddie.UUCP (Jeff Siegal)
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 37

In article <2987@ncsu.UUCP> hand@ncsu.UUCP (Steven Hand) writes:
>Dawn Banks writes:
>
>>What all of this boils down to is that (what I think is) the major failing of
>>the Amiga is its resource utilization.  Sure a 40 meg hard disk and 8M of
>>RAM would certainly mask the problem, however, I'm still not sure why I should
>>be finding myself running out of resources so often on a machine with 512K of
>>ram and two 880K byte floppies.
>
>I agree.  A few years ago I used a PDP-11/60 with the RSX-11/M OS with 6-7
>users and several background tasks, all on 128K MEMORY.  Sure it had a hard
>disk and swapped tasks in and out of memory, but it shows what can be done with
>a professional OS.  It's time for microcomputer OS's to catch up with what
>*was* state-of-the-art years ago.
>

I think it is important to note however, that if you were to try this
today, using the most recent version of RSX-11/M+, you will find that:

1) Many additional capibilities and "nicities" have been added.

2) The memory requirements have increased dramatically.

3) The CPU overhead has increased significantly.

4) Those same 6-7 users would find the system resources sufficiently
   depleted to make using the machine an unpleasant experience.  2-3
   users would be much more reasonable.

Don't forget also, that the 11/60 dosn't support graphics, windows, etc.,
etc., etc....

Operating systems involve real trade-offs.  Don't fool yourself into
believing that XINU, at 4K bytes, is the answer to this most complex
problem.

Jeff Siegal - MIT EECS