Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!info-atari From: Fleysher.wbst@XEROX.COM (Dan Fleysher) Newsgroups: net.micro.atari Subject: Re: 16-bit upgrade for the 800XL, 130XE, etc. Message-ID: <860128-070207-1228@Xerox> Date: Tue, 28-Jan-86 10:02:07 EST Article-I.D.: Xerox.860128-070207-1228 Posted: Tue Jan 28 10:02:07 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 30-Jan-86 05:19:28 EST References: <8601272322.AA01905@mitre-bedford.ARPA> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 27 re: dropping a 65816 into your Atari 800XL in place of the 6502, to upgrade it to 16 bits: Note that ANTIC (the screen display chip) is also an 8 bitter, so you would have to confine your display RAM to within 64K addresses. That's a real bummer - because one of the real advantages of lots of memory would be to have several alternate screens in memory at once and switch between them for animation, etc. Also, having usable RAM above the display area violates Atari 8-bit software architecture, which always puts the display area at the top of available RAM - the extra memory would not be usable by most 8 bitter programs (but you could make RAM disk(s) out of it). Then there's the problem that none of the existing memory decoding handles more than 8 bits. Also, you'd have to find a place to put the additional memory chips without destroying the RF shield - a packaging nightmare. Sounds like an awful lot of work to me, and when you finished up you would still not be able to run ST programs because of instruction set differences between the 65816 and ANTIC and their ST equivalents. Unless you want the experience of tearing apart your 8-bitter and learning something, I think you'd be further ahead to buy a new ST. (Of course, those of us who use our 8 bitters for word processing, game playing and bulletin-board-calling don't really need 16 bits anyway...) Dan -----------------------------------