Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!ut-sally!topaz!harvard!olson From: olson@harvard.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: Red Ryder 7.0 & Other Terminal Programs Message-ID: <678@harvard.UUCP> Date: Tue, 4-Feb-86 09:59:31 EST Article-I.D.: harvard.678 Posted: Tue Feb 4 09:59:31 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 7-Feb-86 08:12:55 EST References: <338@infsc3.hatpoly.UUCP> <8563@amdcad.UUCP> <164@uvicctr.UUCP> <872@umn-cs.UUCP> <413@ism780c.UUCP> Reply-To: olson@harvard.UUCP (Eric olson) Organization: Aiken Comp Lab, Harvard Lines: 35 In article <872@umn-cs.UUCP> waddingt@umn-cs.UUCP (Jake Waddington ) writes: >It is a good complete program with very good support. Note the current >version is 2.00 not 7.0, that is to say Mr. Abelbeck can get it right >the first time. We use VersaTerm in Our lab to talk to our 2.9 Unix system Then, In article <413@ism780c.UUCP> tim@ism780c.UUCP (Tim Smith) writes: >If he got it right the first time, why isn't it 1.00?????? Now, I write: Here here! Not only that, but considering that VersaTerm's version number has three significant digits, it is possible that at version 2.00 it has gone through 200 revisions! Red Ryder, on the other hand, has two sig. digits in its version number, and presumably may have gone through 70 revisions. No, I am NOT being serious here, and I hope Jake wasn't either. It makes no sense to judge a program based on its version number. I should point out that I don't use either of these programs (I use MacTerminal), so I really don't know which is better designed, supported, or any of those other things that really DO make a difference. Another thing worth pointing out is that Red Ryder has had many TOTAL rewrites (according to some recent InfoWorld article), and we all (well, most would agree, anyway) know that this leads to better programs BUT requires mucho time. Most commercial products don't get developed that way (this is not to say, however that VersaTerm did not-- I don't know). I hope I've included enough self-humbling statements in this to avoid being flamed at. I just didn't think it was fair to compare programs by version number. Please, no extended exchanges on this. -Eric.