Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site yetti.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!yetti!oz From: oz@yetti.UUCP (Ozan Yigit) Newsgroups: net.sources,net.micro,net.micro.pc Subject: Re: PC JOVE IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN Message-ID: <319@yetti.UUCP> Date: Wed, 5-Feb-86 13:06:46 EST Article-I.D.: yetti.319 Posted: Wed Feb 5 13:06:46 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 5-Feb-86 15:18:03 EST References: <11699@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Reply-To: oz@yetti.UUCP (Ozan Yigit) Organization: York University Computer Science Lines: 34 Xref: utcs net.sources:4205 net.micro:13382 net.micro.pc:6769 Summary: In article <11699@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> iverson@cory.UUCP (Tim Iverson) writes: > > Recently there were articles posted concerning the availability of >public domain PC JOVE source. I have the source to jove (from a friend of the >author) and as far as I know, PC JOVE IS NOT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. The source >contains explicit copyright notices and it does not give permission to copy >for non-commercial purposes. Furthermore, I was asked not to give the source >or the executable to anyone. If you see a PD PC JOVE, it is probably very >old, or stolen. > Neither old, nor stolen. The copyrighted JOVE is a recent thing, as recent as few months. All previous versions are non-copyrighted. If you want to go to the very earliest version, it was originally distributed by Lincoln-Sudbury highschool (where Jonathan was..) and that does not contain any copyrights either. This means that if you replace the reg. expression code and the temporary I/O code in JOVE, you can distribute it to the world. On the other hand, I am not sure if it is worth it. Perhaps one should wait and see u-emacs before doing anything with jove. Oz > Attempts at contacting Jonathan are being made, but he is no longer >in touch with civilization (i.e. the USENET, :-). > >- Tim Iverson. > iverson@cory.BERKELEY.EDU > iverson@cory.UUCP -- Usenet: [decvax|allegra|linus|ihnp4]!utzoo!yetti!oz Bitnet: oz@[yusol|yuyetti] In the beginning, there was Word all right, except it wasn't fixed number of bits.