Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcsb
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucdcsb!guzzi
From: guzzi@uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: More Than 640K RAM on a Xerox 6064/
Message-ID: <5100118@uiucdcsb>
Date: Wed, 12-Feb-86 16:09:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.5100118
Posted: Wed Feb 12 16:09:00 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 14-Feb-86 07:43:38 EST
References: <1761@rocksvax.UUCP>
Lines: 16
Nf-ID: #R:rocksvax.UUCP:1761:uiucdcsb:5100118:000:630
Nf-From: uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU!guzzi    Feb 12 15:09:00 1986



	If the  Xerox 6064 PC is the same as the ATT 6300 and NOT the
6300+, then you can only put 64k chips in the second bank of memory to get
the 640k maximum.  The 6300+ uses a 80286 and can handle up to 7meg of
memory, but I think MS-DOS still only recognizes 640k.

		      --Mark Guzzi
			University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
		        ARPA:	guzzi@uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu   
				   guzzi%uicsrd@uiuc.arpa
			CSNET:	guzzi%uicsrd@uiuc
			 	   guzzi%uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu@csnet-relay
			UUCP:	{ihnp4,convex,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!guzzi
		        USENET:	...!{pur-ee,ihnp4}!uiucdcs!guzzi
			BITNET: guzzi%uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu@WISCVM.BITN