Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sphinx.UChicago.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!benn From: benn@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP (Thomas Cox) Newsgroups: net.news Subject: the point of spell(1) isn't spelling Message-ID: <1541@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> Date: Sun, 26-Jan-86 09:39:36 EST Article-I.D.: sphinx.1541 Posted: Sun Jan 26 09:39:36 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 27-Jan-86 02:49:14 EST References: <1048@lsuc.UUCP> <1175@osu-eddie.UUCP>, <2645@amdahl.UUCP> Organization: The University of Chicago Lines: 33 [] In article <2645@amdahl.UUCP> gam@amdahl.UUCP (G A Moffett) writes: >I agree that good spelling is an important thing, and it would be >nice if every article contained no misspelled words, but let >the *poster* do it! Why make article posting more cumbersome >for those of us with perfect spelling? And besides, we aren't >even talking about solving a *technical* problem with news, but >to appease the pedantists who cannot tolerate seeing misspelled >words posted to the network. > >PS -- I ran this article thru spell before posting it (I thought > you might like that). >Gordon A. Moffett ...!{ihnp4,cbosgd,seismo,hplabs}!amdahl!gam Before everyone else responds, too... No, the point of this is NOT to correct spelling per se. It is EXPRESSLY to make posting *more* cumbersome. The correcting of misspellings is a side benefit. The more time one spends on a posting, the fewer posts one sends to the net. And the more effort involved, especially nontrivial effort [as opposed to "Do you really want to post this? [yn]" where one automatically hits 'y'], the less volume is posted. This front-end for posting will not keep anyone from posting things that are important. It just makes it less easy to flood the net with trivial postings. BTW, did spell(1) really accept 'thru'? :-) Who, me? I spell perfetly! -- Thomas Cox ...ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!benn Live long, avoid intentionalist terminology, and prosper.