Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbjade.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!ucbjade!ucbopal!mwm From: mwm@ucbopal.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (I'll be mellow when I'm dead) Meyer) Newsgroups: net.news.group Subject: info-68k <-> mod.computers.68k Message-ID: <277@ucbjade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Mon, 27-Jan-86 06:51:28 EST Article-I.D.: ucbjade.277 Posted: Mon Jan 27 06:51:28 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 28-Jan-86 06:16:25 EST Sender: network@ucbjade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mwm@ucbopal.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (I'll be mellow when I'm dead) Meyer) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 34 I'm the list maintainer for the ARPANet info-68k list. When the fa groups moved to mod groups, an offer was made to gateway info-68k, even though it wasn't gatewayed to the fa groups. I decided not to do so at that time, as I didn't think there were enough uucp people on the list to justify it. I've since changed my mind, and would like that gateway turned on. The reasons, in chronological order, are: 1) Some potential readers asked for it. 2) The number of uucp readers subscribing to the list has grown, to the point of being a nuisance to track the uucp paths to them. 3) I've seen an estimate of the number of people required to make news cheaper (for the net) than mail that was much lower than I had expected. While there aren't enough people in uucp-land reading the list to match that estimate, it's easy to imagine it finding enough more readers to make it cheaper. Given the new structure, the obvious name for the group is mod.computers.68k. * This should be a nice, quiet creation: it's moderated, there's a moderator, and the mechanism for it is all set up. All that has to happen is turning on the gateway. Anyone have any major complaints, other than the name? Thanx,