Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!gatech!seismo!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re: quantum mechanics and all that
Message-ID: <693@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 6-Feb-86 18:52:41 EST
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.693
Posted: Thu Feb  6 18:52:41 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 11-Feb-86 04:28:48 EST
References: <433@umich.UUCP> <2113@brl-tgr.ARPA> <11716@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.ARPA
Distribution: net
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 24

>>>Had the person who posted the article to which I'm replying broken NETNEWS
>>>tradition and actually READ all the articles he was replying to, he might have
>>>known that we (Ken Rimey and I) were already aware of all the points he made.
>>> 
>>> Mildly disgusted,
>>> --Paul Torek							torek@umich
>>
>>Perhaps Torek and Rimey should arrive at a consensus,
>>then post that result for the rest of us to read,
>>rather than carrying on such an extended private
>>dialogue in the news group.

Ken Rimey was offended by this suggestion.
My perception was that the discussion was going
nowhere, and that it would be more useful to post
conclusive points of agreement rather than all the
false leads.  If people actually find the discussion
useful, then I withdraw the suggestion.  (It does
remind me a lot of the sort of discussion you get
among a few college undergrads, though.  I haven't
heard anything new yet.)

Of course, THIS discussion is not useful, either,
and should be continued off-line if at all.